How to write footnotes and the bibliography
Chicago Manual of Style including Quick Guide
University of Otago Department of Theology and Religious Studies Resources
Other tips to improve your grades
Translate the question asked into the question you are answering.
Remember that a topic area is not the same as a question
- if you are starting with a topic, you need to ask a question about that topic.
Look for key words and check what they mean. Don't just
look for familiar words and write down everything they bring to mind.
Discuss the question with somebody else - anybody else!
After you have an idea about the question, and you
have rewritten it in your own words, look up the books, read the articles, work
out your lay out, prepare a bibliography, and talk about the assignment some
more with others.
Use different types of sources together, such as books, the web, articles and conversations. The bibliography should indicate books and articles you have made use of other than the Bible, together with material from the world wide web, and a list of key people you discussed the assignment with. If appropriate it should list the documents and collections from the archives you consulted. It should have a good number of entries (One item per 100 words at least)
Tidy and readable work is easier to mark. An opening paragraph
saying what it is about creates the impression you know what you are doing.
If it is difficult to read it may be returned.
Watch your word length. Assignments should be close to the
specified word length. Word-lengths do not include footnotes.
Unless it is very bad you won't be marked down for grammar
and spelling - provided you have made an effort and it is clear what you are
trying to say. However attention will be drawn to problems in this area and
signs of effort and improvement are expected in subsequent essays.
Essays have a beginning, a middle and an end. Begin by summarising
the question in your own words and indicating how you intend to answer it.
Do not write in pencil.
Use A4 size paper only.
Avoid over use of personal pronouns. An essay should not be emotional, though it may have an emotional effect on the reader. Do not preach, do not be angry, surprised or indignant. Do not be sarcastic, but gentle irony shows sympathy with human foibles you are not blind to. You may disagree, even strongly, but show you understand where people you disagree with are coming from.
Try and find some point of special interest for you in the
question and allow that to shape your reading and thinking - but do not let
it dominate. A small personal reference is OK, but these are usually best kept
to discussion even though the current trend is to encourage personal comments
in "objective" writing.
Follow a recognisable
bibliographical style, and
try to be consistent even though most of us find that difficult. Titles of books
and journals in footnotes and bibliography should be in
italics or underlined...
The titles of articles in journals and entries in encyclopedias should be in
single or double inverted commas. (It is the title of the journal or the encyclopedia
itself which should be in italics or underlined.) Your bibliography should be
in alphabetical order and does not need to be numbered.
While the emphasis is not on remembering information, you
need to write as if you know what you are talking about - which is not the same
as trying to be impressive.
Use reference books like a Dictionary of Church History or
an Encyclopaedia or Wikipedia to get the essential information about people,
places and movements. Build on that with more difficult books and articles.
Sometimes there will be a contradiction between different
sources. Make a decision that seems reasonable to you and if it seems to be
important, make a note of the difference in a footnote.
In fact none of us have time, so identity the main points and start writing straight away - try to write every day.
Get a framework of an answer written out as soon as possible
using just your basic references, then build on that using wider reading.
Your answer will be adequate if it covers the main points,
but ask yourself whether there are other aspects to the question you could say
something about.
Avoid
Have you really satisfied yourself? Try and make sure it
is as good as you can make it before you hand it in (
Ask yourself what is really going on here?
What are the issues?
How does one part affect the others?
What are different perspectives and why?
Is there another way of looking at this?
Thinking about what you are writing, about what things mean, about their significance.
Don't get too personal, but don't be totally detached either.
Some issues are about life and faith: they matter. Some of that should show.
If you are not sure how much reflection in the light of your own traditions
and concerns is acceptable, check it out with the lecturer.
Make use of the knowledge, experience and questions you already have.
Never assume that the only “correct” answers are to be found
in the library. There are wrong answers as well as helpful ones in many places
not just on the internet. People say the library has greater quality control.
In theory that may be, but in practice the same effort at making common sense
judgements is required. Develop your own judgement. Identify reliable authors
and sites.
Take a different approach.
Ask a different question.
Look at it sideways.
Take a little risk - you can always check it out if you are not certain about it.
Talk to other students about how they understand the question,
what books they recommend, and what ideas they have for working at it.
Again, use material from a range of sources in the one assignment,
including where possible some primary sources
Evaluate alternatives
Exercise critical judgement in integrating material from
different areas.
Check and make sure you really are answering the question
(A surprising number of people don't.) – if necessary see if you can change
the question.
It is often helpful to look at book reviews on Amazon and in
journals and also browse other things a particular author has written. Published
book reviews vary in quality enormously. In general a good book review covers the
following
What was the author was trying to say?
How well did they succeeded
in what they were
trying to do - that is, how successful were
they in their own terms?
How well did they succeeded in terms of other criteria (which
may need to be indicated in case they are not obvious to the readers)?
Discuss some of the key issues raised directly or indirectly
by the book.
Who is the book intended for and how well does it addresses
the concerns of that audience?