Thinking about Christian mission

What we are about

The Church is about worship and about mission and about being a sign of the presence and the coming of the Kingdom of God.

We seek to be a worshipping community that nurtures faith, a faithful community that stimulates mission, and a missionary community that is rooted in worship.

In music and word, poetry and movement, art and action, we come just as we are as we also strive to offer the best that we can be.

In home and community, workplace and church, we serve others through being true to ourselves, claiming God’s promise to do more than we can ask or think.

The church exists to call people to worship God, to follow Jesus Christ, and to make him known, to make it possible for people to know that God is with us.

We recognise the authority of the Word of God over the church and the world, and our responsibility to discern, obey and proclaim that Word.

We bear witness to the grace of God in Jesus Christ and to the gift and gifts of the Holy Spirit.

We are thankful for the goodness of creation and acknowledge our responsibility to respect its integrity and to share its gifts.

In this land of beauty and uncertainty, of living covenants and broken promises, of renewed hope and slow justice, of open spaces and shifting values, we would seek Jesus, and ask that he teach us to pray.

We want to live lives that make it more easy and not more difficult for others to believe in God.

Not for ourselves only do we seek to build communities that make it possible to live the Christian life.

We want to seek and to share truth, to encourage faithfulness, to facilitate a sense of wonder, to stir curiosity for the things of God and of creation, and never to lose our respect for wisdom.

We acknowledge our inability to be all things to all people, but we aim to be a safe place for lovers and children, for the elderly and the awkward, for the hurt and the handicapped, for the different and the simple, for friends and the friendless, for those who have found success, and those for whom there is no place to rest. Without one another we are incomplete in Christ.

We recognise our responsibility to respect the cultures of our heritage, to affirm what is good, and to challenge all that makes people less than human.

We confess that we see justice in different ways, and perceive paths to peace through different routes. We struggle with the burden of discernment through prayer, study and debate. We acknowledge the pain of change and the cost of renewal.

In every age the Scriptures speak with fresh relevance. We join the prayers of the Psalms with the passions and anxieties of our lives. We share the wanderings, faith and failures of the people of Israel. We respect the profundity and example of Paul. We hear Jesus’ promises in the beatitudes, his challenge in the Sermon on the Mount and his humour and seriousness in the parables.

In communion we share memories of his life, death and rising again. Like the first disciples we worship even as some of us have doubts, and also like the first disciples we accept his call to go, to baptise and to teach.

We recognise Jesus’ authority and claim the promise of his presence. We pray that the Spirit of the Lord, which came upon him, may also be upon us, to bring good news to the poor, liberty to captives, sight to the blind, and to inspire words and deeds which say that the time has come when the Lord will save his people.

The men and women who brought us to this land also shape us. We recall with nostalgia and respect heroes of conviction, the struggles of ordinary life and stories of costly faith.

May we learn from their failings as from their success, and imitate their faith not their foolishness. May we too take risks to find pearls of great price.

Help us also to love the Lord our God with all our heart, with all our soul, with all our mind, and with all our strength, and our neighbour as ourselves.

A sustainable commitment

If missiology is to go on helping the church in different circumstances be confident about what it is doing it needs both a modest and a strong place among its fellow theological disciplines:

It needs to be modest in that while missiologists may be champions of the mission of the church they are not its owners. Other theological specialities, and the faith of church leaders and Christians generally are stakeholders in determining and obeying the mission of the church in particular times and places. Missiologists may help provide the tools, but they are but partners in the exercise.

It needs to be strong since missiologists have things to say that those with less experience in mission across and within cultures are less likely to say. Their place in the church, and in the training of the church's leaders needs to be  assured. Left to themselves other disciplines do not always appreciate the learnings that lie in the story of the church's mission, or the importance of cultures other than one's own for understanding what it is about.

While sustainability is no infallible indicator of truth, if a particular vision of mission is not sustainable for a Christian community it at least raises questions about whether the fundamentals are right or not. The history of churches and mission societies that have tried to make mission the sole reason for their existence does not lead me to believe that such an emphasis, however sincere and worthy, is in fact sustainable. Indeed by its neglect of worship and failure to address the demands of community it may in fact be theologically suspect as well as socially impracticable.

Thinking about God, the Church and the world

1) A triangle of relationships

We cannot understand what is required of the Church towards the World, or understand the importance of culture for the Church, without taking into account what is going on between God and the World, the World and God, and between God and the Church.

2) Worship, Community and Mission are fundamental dimensions of the Church's life:


Lists of the fundamental dimensions which constitute church are often longer than this, and the categories identified often do not have a hierarchy of relationship though many want to place mission at the top. I prefer to think of these three dimensions as primary and then thinking what they mean and what else they involve indifferent situations. The three do of course interrelate and particular elements such as leadership appear across the three.

This linking of Worship, Mission and Community arose for me out of reflection about the core dimensions of the purpose of the church, and somewhat rarely also appear elsewhere. Writings that I have come across include the Mennonite Board of Congregational Ministries, A three fold vision for worship, community and mission, Herald Press, 1997, and in Daniel Schipani, "The Church and its Theological Education: A Vision" in  Nancy Heiser and Daniel S. Schipani. Theological education on five continents : Anabaptist perspectives, Occasional papers (Institute of Mennonite Studies (Elkhart, Ind.). Strasbourg, France: Mennonite World Conference, 1997, pp.14-21. The phrase also appears in Grace Wenger, Witness: empowering the church through worship, community, and mission. Scottdale, Pa.: Herald Press, 1989. A similar concern can be found in John Piper, Let the nations be glad, Baker, 2003

3) Working with others to explore the issues of today.

Christians and churches participating in debate about ethics, ecology, economics, globalisation and politics and bringing their faith to these conversations has a theological basis in our faith in the Lordship of Christ over the whole of life. Christians do not need to be afraid of growing in and sharing what it is to follow Jesus Christ through dialogue with other people in their understanding what the Bible means and what Jesus is about.

Saying less, achieving more?

I have often had a polite but bewildered reception to these ideas - the primacy of mission in ecclesiology is considered so theologically self-evident that it seems ridiculous to suggest otherwise. And of course in a very simple sense, to the point of being a tautology, the mission of the church is mission - but that lies in the meaning of words not in the purposes of God. Yet I continue to believe that discourse about mission which shifts from saying the church has a missionary dimension to saying mission is what the church is all about is actually a theological, pastoral and strategic mistake.

 It may be against the grain for to say that less is more as far as the promotion of mission is concerned, but I think actually think it is. Whatever our rhetoric about being missional the actual life of the church properly involves a balanced commitment to our worship, our community life and our purpose or mission outside of ourselves. There is no point in trying to make mission the key to the others and there is in my view some danger. However I acknowledge I need to work at how to present this material more adequately, including theologically.

People are tired of being told to be missional or missionary when their need is to be renewed in their love of God. Perhaps Augustine was right in saying "love God and do as you like." It could be the great release of the grace of God we need to hear. We might just find, as has often been the case that spiritual renewal that avoids the temptation of selfishness will also lead to the renewal of mission. It is faith not harangues which revives our connection with the work of God in the world. I see calls to mission running out of steam and people discovered the need for a grounding in spirituality if they are to be able sustain their own interest and the interest of others. If some churches are dead in their liturgies then the answer is not  to say "rise up and be missionary because that is your identity" it is to say "renew your liturgy and in that you will find your power for mission."

Talk about mission often shades into concern to save the church more than save the world, perhaps it is in a proper attention to "saving" our worship and our life together that we may be in fact able to do a bit more in the wider mission of God.

If you have thoughts on these issues please email me on

John Roxborogh 30 November 2010